What is the Difference Between Microchanneling and Microneedling?

If you’re researching skin rejuvenation treatments, you’ve likely come across both microneedling and Procell microchannelling. While these treatments may seem similar, there are important differences that can significantly impact your results, comfort, and recovery time.

What is traditional microneedling?

Traditional microneedling (also called collagen induction therapy or derma rolling) uses devices with fine needles to create controlled micro-injuries in the skin. These injuries trigger your body’s natural healing response, stimulating collagen and elastin production. The treatment has been popular for years, helping improve skin texture, scars, and signs of ageing.

Common traditional microneedling devices include derma rollers, dermapens, and various automated needling devices that use a rolling or dragging motion across the skin.

What is Procell microchannelling?

Procell microchannelling represents an evolution in microneedling technology. While it works on the same principle of creating controlled micro-channels to stimulate healing, Procell uses advanced stamping technology and combines it with scientifically developed growth factor serums derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

This combination of refined technique and bioidentical growth factors has earned Procell the tagline “Microneedling Evolved.”

Key differences between Procell and traditional microneedling

Needle technology and technique

Traditional microneedling:

  • Uses rolling or dragging motion across the skin
  • Standard needles of varying sizes
  • Can create tearing or inconsistent channel depths
  • May cause more trauma to surrounding tissue

Procell microchannelling:

  • Uses vertical stamping motion for precise, uniform channels
  • Ultra-fine surgical-grade steel filaments (small enough to fit in a hair follicle)
  • Creates clean, consistent micro-channels without tearing
  • Minimal trauma to surrounding tissue

Serums and growth factors

Traditional microneedling:

  • Typically uses basic serums like hyaluronic acid, vitamin C, or saline
  • Serums are often generic and not specifically designed for the treatment
  • Limited penetration and effectiveness
  • Results depend mainly on the body’s natural healing alone

Procell microchannelling:

  • Uses proprietary Stem Cytokine™ technology with growth factors from stem cells
  • Serums contain bioidentical proteins including TGF-β, EGF, and PDGF
  • Specifically formulated to work synergistically with the microchannelling process
  • Accelerates and enhances the body’s natural healing response

Downtime and recovery

Traditional microneedling:

  • Typically 3-5 days of visible redness and irritation
  • May experience pinpoint bleeding during treatment
  • Longer social downtime required
  • More extensive aftercare needed

Procell microchannelling:

  • Usually 24-48 hours of mild redness (similar to light sunburn)
  • Minimal to no bleeding during treatment
  • Can return to normal activities within 1-2 days
  • Simple aftercare routine

Comfort during treatment

Traditional microneedling:

  • Often described as moderately uncomfortable
  • May require stronger numbing cream
  • Dragging sensation can be unpleasant
  • Treatment time varies based on technique

Procell microchannelling:

  • Most clients describe only light prickling sensation
  • Numbing cream optional for most clients
  • Quick stamping motion is generally well-tolerated
  • Consistent 30-45 minute treatment time

Results timeline

Traditional microneedling:

  • Initial results visible after 4-6 weeks
  • Requires multiple sessions for significant improvement
  • Results vary based on device quality and technique
  • Maintenance needed every 6-12 months

Procell microchannelling:

  • Many notice immediate healthy glow
  • Visible improvements typically begin within 2-4 weeks
  • Enhanced results due to growth factor serums
  • Maintenance recommended every 3-6 months for optimal results

Which treatment suits different skin concerns?

Fine lines and wrinkles

Both treatments can help, but Procell’s growth factors provide additional anti-ageing benefits by supporting cellular renewal at a deeper level.

Acne scarring

While traditional microneedling can improve scarring, Procell’s uniform channel creation and stem cell technology may provide more consistent results, particularly for rolling and boxcar scars.

Skin tone and texture

Both treatments improve texture, but Procell’s precise stamping technique creates more uniform results across the treatment area.

Sensitive skin

Procell’s gentler technique and shorter downtime make it more suitable for those with sensitive skin or busy lifestyles.

Cost considerations

While individual session costs may be comparable, consider the total investment:

  • Treatment frequency: You may need fewer Procell sessions to achieve desired results
  • Downtime costs: Less time away from work or social activities with Procell
  • Product requirements: Procell includes specialised serums; traditional microneedling may require separate product purchases
  • Long-term value: Enhanced results from Procell may mean less frequent maintenance

Making your decision

When choosing between Procell microchannelling and traditional microneedling, consider:

  1. Your lifestyle: If you need minimal downtime, Procell offers faster recovery
  2. Skin sensitivity: Procell’s gentler approach suits sensitive skin better
  3. Treatment goals: For comprehensive anti-ageing, Procell’s growth factors provide additional benefits
  4. Budget: Consider total investment including number of sessions needed

Why clinics are choosing Procell

Many clinics are transitioning to Procell microchannelling because:

  • The science behind the growth factor serums is compelling and evidence-based
  • Clients experience less discomfort and downtime
  • Results are consistent and reproducible
  • The treatment suits all skin types safely

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Procell worth the investment over traditional microneedling?

Many clients find Procell’s reduced downtime, enhanced comfort, and growth factor benefits justify any price difference. The combination of advanced technique and scientifically developed serums often leads to superior results with fewer sessions needed.

Can I switch from traditional microneedling to Procell?

Yes, many clients transition to Procell after experiencing traditional microneedling. We recommend waiting 4-6 weeks after your last microneedling session before starting Procell treatments.

How do I know which treatment is right for me?

The best way to determine your ideal treatment is through a professional consultation. Your clinician will assess your skin, discuss your goals, and recommend the most appropriate option based on your individual needs.

Conclusion

While both traditional microneedling and Procell microchannelling stimulate collagen production through controlled micro-injuries, the similarities largely end there. Procell’s advanced stamping technology, combined with its scientifically developed growth factor serums, represents a significant evolution in the field.

The reduced downtime, enhanced comfort, and superior results make Procell an attractive option for those seeking skin rejuvenation without the extended recovery period of traditional treatments. However, both treatments have their place in modern skincare, and the best choice depends on your individual skin concerns, lifestyle, and treatment goals.

Whether you choose traditional microneedling or Procell microchannelling, the key to success lies in working with experienced practitioners who can customise the treatment to your unique needs.

Ready to learn more about which treatment is right for your skin? Book a consultation with our experienced clinicians at Fresh Skin Clinic. Call (08) 9315 2060 or book online.